Well its all gone quiet over there! Not so keen on finding facts out now are they? Lets find a few more for them:
Yet again, this is yet another shabby case
I'd say the only thing shabby has been the uninformed guesswork posted on CAG:
I withdrew from this case in July of that year due to incompatibility with the claimant and have never been involved since.
Yeah right-Was the date of your invoice doctored as well then?
Given that the McKenzie (The Guru) has been heavily instrumental in leading this entire litigation
No he hasn't
Having seen many of the legal arguments presented by that place, I will bet the judge was not best pleased
You wouldn't know a legal argument if one hit you in the face you prat.
...and for the avoidance of doubt, he concluded assisting Mr Johnston a very long time ago (mid 2011).
No he didn't
According to the 'Guru' he would have us all believe he came to the case 'late' and therefore played little part in the preparation of it!!
Shock horror!!! The Guru was telling the truth-Still you know best eh?
Mr Johnson probably had the post part written as he named the Guru in it
Most men of the world have minds of our own-We're not all as soppy as you, you know?
Given that this thread concerns a different subject, I will refrain from making any further posts.
Just for once, can you do the world a favour and stick to your promise?
If the post is indeed in the wild, then it makes the mods on here look silly for deleting it
They're a complete waste of space-They've looked "silly" for as long as I've been posting on these boards.
All they have done is distract interest away from the fact that another person has been screwed by the court due to bad advice being given on there
Any chance of you breaking the habit of a lifetime and actually pointing us all towards this so called "bad advice"? That's what all your mithering is about in the first place isn't it? Is there any actual bad advice? If so, just point us to It. What could be simpler?
I think, that ship sailed long ago.
Oh the irony
Anyone that knows me will know that I have only ever told the truth
So for clarity, when you told me that you got fined for "road tax" and paid it because you didn't want to face bailiffs, you were telling the truth? Was this a separate "road tax" offence to those reported in the papers then?
FP has also sent me a copy of the invoice that he sent to the motor trader in 2011. It is not for the amount of £1,700
We believe you FP-Thousands wouldn't.
This case deserves it's own thread tomorrow and I will naturally provide an accurate account.
That went well for you didn't it?......Naturally.