daveBeeston wrote:Tuco you really do make this forum such a friendly place don't you?
People come here at the first port of call for help with bailiffs. You can see that for yourself.
Where did i even hint that i thought you would "All bow down in mock homage at the arrival of the saviour?", all i asked was that we engage in a civilized discussion on the issues between the 2 sites, i can see that request is beyond you which is a shame.
When the crank is involved, its not possible to have a civilised discussion. I can play you a 15 minute recording if you like. Otherwise her forum activity speaks for itself. Her intention is not having a civilised discussion. It's starting a flame war as part of a campaign against me. The Quatloos thread is testament to that.
If kipper nickers has lied about tax offences then yes that is of serious concern and im sure that those offences will have been dealt with by the relevant authority(or at least i hope they would of),
Would you like to see that? The quatloos is a perfect venue for exposing such scammers, and the evidence is abundant.
Perhaps you would like to pass the evidence to Taunton Dean Magistrates court and invite them to investigate the crank giving a false address to avoid being discovered and getting out of paying her court fines. The Court Manager, Magistrates Court, St Johns Rd, Taunton TA1 4AX. 01823 257084
regarding the IP address issue do you not see the problem that could cause in regards to Jason's credibility and the whole sites credibility?
The delving into someones private life is not acceptable and i agree Jason has every right to put a stop to it.
There is little I can do to stop it, even if her action commits an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. I'd wager a better chance of conviction under 21 of the Data Protection Act 1998. I have sufficient evidence to bring a proceeding against her for slander. I'll bring her into court when time and work scheduling allows me.
Regarding the double standards you mention surely that applies to Jason and whoever else has delved into kipper nickers's private life in order to find out about the alleged tax offences, if you want them to stop then you need to do the same you cannot have it both ways.
I did not investigate the crank's private life. She has too many enemies and it is bound to come back.
Now onto the reopening of the thread, the thread was reopened due to the post here regarding the IP address issue so you can hardly claim the high ground on that can you, after all it was Jason's lie that caused the reopening of the thread so Wes could respond on a platform where he is not banned.
I did not breach any of his website rules, but he banned me. He only gets one chance then it goes elsewhere. He knew the score and he knew the risks.